The Transformation Process as an Adaptive Cycle Illustrated by Recovery from Desertification in Shinyanga
Keywords:
Social-Ecological Systems, Transformation Process, Ecosystem Recovery, Sustainability AnalysisAbstract
The paper delineates a framework for social-ecological system assessment and transformation based on Holling’s adaptive cycle. It considers assessments of disturbance beyond the biophysical system's capacity to recover. The transformation process for recovery is depicted as an adaptive cycle of using human and economic resources (exploitation phase), accumulating knowledge as well as social, cultural, and economic capital (accumulation phase), formulating new approaches to biophysical system management (disturbance phase), and developing new institutional arrangements (reorganization phase). The transformation process leads to the implementation of management interventions for the biophysical system. Interventions relate to the four phases of the biophysical system adaptive cycle: (1) reducing pressure on the resource (exploitation phase), (2) addressing legacy issues (accumulation phase), (3) increasing system resilience (disturbance phase), and (4) rehabilitating adverse effects (reorganisation phase).
In Shinyanga, Tanzania, before colonial occupation, there were intact Miombo and Acacia woodlands. Woodland clearance to eradicate tsetse flies and expand agriculture led to soil erosion and desertification. Centralized attempts at restoration by the colonial government, and subsequently the independent government, failed to be implemented. When a new centralized program was established in 1986, the program manager found he needed to work in partnership with local farmers and incorporate traditional knowledge and institutions to be effective. The traditional practice of ngitili enclosures (areas of standing vegetation that remain closed to livestock during the wet season to be used as fodder resources during the dry season) was integrated with modern agroforestry techniques. A nested system of village, regional, and national institutions was created, and international financial contributions were received. Restoration of woodlands was achieved, and other ecosystem services increased, such as wood supply, bringing economic benefits and improving biodiversity. Sustainability analysis identified disturbance threats to be managed for ongoing sustainability, such as population growth, elite capture of benefits, and rule compliance by neighboring villages.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Bryan Jenkins (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Social Innovations Journal permits the Creative Commons License:
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material
Copyright and Publishing Rights
For the licenses indicated above, authors retain the copyright and full publishing rights without restrictions.